home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Space & Astronomy
/
Space and Astronomy (October 1993).iso
/
mac
/
TEXT
/
SPACEDIG
/
V15_5
/
V15NO538.TXT
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1993-07-13
|
13KB
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 92 05:24:15
From: Space Digest maintainer <digests@isu.isunet.edu>
Reply-To: Space-request@isu.isunet.edu
Subject: Space Digest V15 #538
To: Space Digest Readers
Precedence: bulk
Space Digest Sat, 12 Dec 92 Volume 15 : Issue 538
Today's Topics:
absolutely, positively overnight (2 msgs)
Casinissini Udergoed Intense Design Review
Galileo Update - 12/11/92
Space Tourism
Welcome to the Space Digest!! Please send your messages to
"space@isu.isunet.edu", and (un)subscription requests of the form
"Subscribe Space <your name>" to one of these addresses: listserv@uga
(BITNET), rice::boyle (SPAN/NSInet), utadnx::utspan::rice::boyle
(THENET), or space-REQUEST@isu.isunet.edu (Internet).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 16:40:45 GMT
From: "forrest.e.gehrke" <feg@cbnewsb.cb.att.com>
Subject: absolutely, positively overnight
Newsgroups: sci.space
In article <Bz2Cwy.7I6@zoo.toronto.edu> henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes:
>
>It probably will be subject to missile-proliferation rules, at least at
>the start. If spaceships start becoming common, then limited missile
>defences are probably going to become common too. (They have to anyway,
>because building a V-2 equivalent is no longer that difficult.)
>--
You mean (Gasp!) Senator Nunn will have to give up and agree to
ending the Anti-missile Treaty?
Forrest Gehrke feg@dodger.att.com
------------------------------
Date: 11 Dec 92 22:07:11 GMT
From: Henry Spencer <henry@zoo.toronto.edu>
Subject: absolutely, positively overnight
Newsgroups: sci.space
In article <1992Dec11.172437.24552@ke4zv.uucp> gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman) writes:
>>... The Saudi
>>royal family would surely buy one. And then there's Air Force One...
>
>Take a look at Air Force One, or Two. A 747 and a 707. The Air Force
>is very conservative in the choice of aircraft on which to fly the
>President. The Saudi royals are even more conservative... Give DC 20
>years of routine passenger carrying flight experience...
They adopted the 707 much more quickly than that. The long delay for
the transition to the 747 was because it was a lot more expensive and
the 707s were working well, not because they were nervous about the
747 being new.
I don't seriously expect that a DC-1 would ever become Air Force One,
actually. Not because it's dangerous, but because it's too *small*,
and because servicing facilities for it won't be nearly as common as
those for 747s for a long time. But I rather suspect it would be rather
less than twenty years before the president rides in one. He *is* the
boss, after all...
--
"God willing... we shall return." | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
-Gene Cernan, the Moon, Dec 1972 | henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
------------------------------
Date: 12 Dec 92 05:58:31 GMT
From: Ryan Korniloff <rkornilo@nyx.cs.du.edu>
Subject: Casinissini Udergoed Intense Design Review
Newsgroups: sci.space
Regarding the Titan probe - will it have a camra to take images of the
landscape? I am aware of how dim the sun is at tha distance compounded
with the thickness of Titan's atmosphere. But these shouldn't require
mayjor technical feats..
-- Ryan Korniloff
-- rkornilo@nyx.cs.du.edu
------------------------------
Date: 12 Dec 92 06:34:51 GMT
From: Ron Baalke <baalke@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov>
Subject: Galileo Update - 12/11/92
Newsgroups: sci.space,sci.astro.alt.sci.planetary
Forwarded from Neal Ausman, Galileo Mission Director
GALILEO
MISSION DIRECTOR STATUS REPORT
POST-LAUNCH
December 4 - 10, 1992
SPACECRAFT
1. On December 4, real-time commands were sent to change the telemetry rate
from 115.2 kbps to 28.8 kbps so that DSS-12 (Goldstone 34 meter antenna)
could process downlink telemetry. This change was necessary when ground
station problems at DSS-14 (Goldstone 70 meter antenna) caused the Project
to request tracking support at DSS-12. The spacecraft telemetry rate under
stored sequence control was switched back to 115.2 kbps after DSS-12 tracking
support ended. Upon completion of commanding, the CDS (Command Data
Subsystem) command lock counter had increased by 4 which was 2 more than
expected. No unplanned commands were received/processed by the spacecraft.
Analysis of this incident is in progress.
2. On December 4, Part 1 of the EE-11 Earth encounter sequence memory load
was uplinked to the spacecraft without incident. Part 2 of the EE-11 Earth
encounter sequence memory load was uplinked on December 7. This sequence
covers spacecraft activities from December 7, 1992 to December 28, 1992 and
includes the Earth closest approach on December 8, 1992.
The December 7 EE-11 uplink was delayed for approximately 45 minutes
while the ground station transmitter configuration was changed from 18kw with
4db command modulation suppression to 5.5kw with 0.5db command modulation
suppression to eliminate command feedthru degradation of downlink telemetry.
3. During this reporting period, numerous science instrument
calibration/characterization activities were performed to take advantage of
the high telemetry data rates while close to the Earth. Activities included
Magnetometer (MAG) scan platform interference test, Solid State Imaging (SSI)
boomscatter test, and a MAG calibration coil. All calibration/characterization
activities were performed nominally and data analysis is in progress.
4. On December 5, real-time commands were sent to update the gyro drift
parameters using spacecraft gyro data collected on November 29. This update
was performed to meet the scan platform pointing requirements in support
of Earth 2 science data collection when the star scanner shutter was closed.
5. On December 5, real-time commands were sent to disable the AACS (Attitude
and Articulation Control Subsystem) sun-dependent algorithms and enable the
AACS bright body fault protection in preparation for the Earth 2 flyby. The
commands executed nominally on the spacecraft prior to the start of the EE-11
Earth encounter sequence.
6. On December 5 and 6, NO-OP commands were sent to reset the command loss
timer to 72 hours, its planned value during this mission phase.
7. On December 8, Earth closest approach occurred at 7:09:25 AM PST at an
altitude of 303.1 km. The Earth Gravity Assist (EGA) was performed flawlessly.
During the Earth closest approach time period, the Galileo spacecraft took
observations of the magnetosphere, Moon and Earth system.
8. On December 8, approximately three hours after closest approach, real-time
commands were sent to enable the AACS attitude control sun dependent
algorithms to their nominal post fly-by state. Also, the command loss timer
was reset to 11 days in accordance with the EE-11 sequence strategy.
9. On December 8, real-time commands were sent to update the attitude control
bright body vector in the EE-11 Earth encounter sequence to permit star set
acquisition for the December 10 stored-sequence SITURN.
10. On December 8, after approximately 8 hours after closest approach,
real-time commands were sent at PI (Principal Investigator's) request to turn
off the Energetic Particle Detector (EPD) LEMMS-A detector bias.
11. On December 9, the Galileo Optical Communications Experiment from an
Earth-based Xmitter (GOPEX) experiment began. This experiment consists of
pulsing a laser at the Galileo spacecraft from the Table Mountain Observatory
(TMO) and the Starfire Optical Range (SOR). The Solid State Imaging (SSI)
camera is shuttered while slewing across the Earth resulting in a series of
illuminated pixels in the image. The experiment is continuing at the writing
of this report. Preliminary analysis of the data is in progress.
12. On December 10, the spacecraft executed an 11-degree SITURN. The main
purpose of the SITURN was to maintain the spacecraft within plus or minus 10
degrees of the sun at the current solar distance.
13. The AC/DC bus imbalance measurements exhibited some change. The AC
measurement has ranged from 16DN to 17DN and now reads 17DN (3.9 volts).
The DC measurement has ranged from 115DN (13.4 volts) to 148DN (17.4 volts)
and now reads 132DN (15.5 volts). These measurement variations are consistent
with the model developed by the AC/DC special anomaly team.
14. The Spacecraft status as of December 10, 1992, is as follows:
a) System Power Margin - 59 watts
b) Spin Configuration - Dual-Spin
c) Spin Rate/Sensor - 3.15rpm/Star Scanner
d) Spacecraft Attitude is approximately 4 degree
off-sun (leading) and 95 degrees off-earth (leading)
e) Downlink telemetry rate/antenna-67.2kbps (coded)/LGA-1
f) General Thermal Control - all temperatures within
acceptable range
g) RPM Tank Pressures - all within acceptable range
h) Orbiter Science- all instruments are powered on
except the PPR
i) Probe/RRH - powered off, temperatures within
acceptable range
j) CMD Loss Timer Setting - 264 hours
Time To Initiation - 215 hours
TRAJECTORY
As of noon Thursday, December 10, 1992, the Galileo Spacecraft trajectory
status was as follows:
Distance from Earth 1,583,900 km (.01 AU)
Distance from Sun 147,088,200 km (0.98 AU)
Heliocentric Speed 140,500 km per hour
Distance from Jupiter 857,457,800 km
Round Trip Light Time 0 minutes, 12 seconds
SPECIAL TOPIC
1. As of December 10, 1992, a total of 8786 real-time commands have been
transmitted to Galileo since Launch. Of these, 3753 were initiated in the
sequence design process and 5033 initiated in the real-time command process.
In the past week, 74 real time commands were transmitted: 72 were initiated
in the sequence design process and 2 initiated in the real time command
process. Major command activities this week included commands to change the
telemetry rate, uplink the EE-11 Earth encounter sequence memory load, update
gyro drift parameters, disable sun-dependent algorithms, enable bright body
fault protection, reset the command loss timer, enable the sun-dependent
algorithms, update the bright body vector, and turn the EPD detector bias off.
2. Intermittent telemetry has been observed since Earth closest approach as
a result of a 6db variation in signal levels received at the tracking stations.
The causes for these variations is presently unknown, but is likely the result
of spacecraft boom/structural interference, high telecom cone angles
(>110 degrees) and possibly RF leakage from LGA-2 (Low Gain Antenna #2).
After the SITURN on December 10, the cone angle was approximately 95 degrees
and the ground received signal variations and data degradations were
considerably reduced. Analysis of the trajectory and the stored-sequence
planned SITURN indicates that the cone angle will not again reach 100 degrees.
A stored-sequence SITURN on December 16, prior to the Earth/Moon conjunction
playback, will further reduce the cone angle to less than 85 degrees. At cone
angels less than 85 degrees no boom/structural interferences is possible;
correspondingly telecommunication performance is expected to further improve.
___ _____ ___
/_ /| /____/ \ /_ /| Ron Baalke | baalke@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov
| | | | __ \ /| | | | Jet Propulsion Lab |
___| | | | |__) |/ | | |__ M/S 525-3684 Telos | The 3 things that children
/___| | | | ___/ | |/__ /| Pasadena, CA 91109 | find the most fascinating:
|_____|/ |_|/ |_____|/ | space, dinosaurs and ghosts.
------------------------------
Date: 11 Dec 92 21:23:21 GMT
From: Josh 'K' Hopkins <jbh55289@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Space Tourism
Newsgroups: sci.space
henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes:
[responding to me..]
>>That was the subject in mind. I agree on space tourism. Do you have any
>>numbers to post though?
>I don't know what the numbers were like, but I do know that business was
>brisk when Society Expeditions was taking bookings for hoped-for Phoenix
>orbital flights at $50k a head.
Right. There was an Air & Space article on this a number of years ago. They
also carried the original add in their first issue - quite an eyecatcher. As
I recall there were something like 350 people who put down $500 deposits on a
$52,000 flight. I think they were eventually refunded but I'm pretty sure
that they were supposed to be non-refundable. So, if 350 people will pay
$52,000 for a vehicle that isn't flying and isn't all that heavily advertised
I think we can assume that this price will provide a big enough market for
space tourism. The next question is how much higher it can get before the
market dries up. Is there any other data out there? What's the maximum that
real people pay for really cool Earth-bound trips? Anyone ever priced a trip
to Antarctica?
--
Josh Hopkins jbh55289@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
Ho^3 !=L
------------------------------
End of Space Digest Volume 15 : Issue 538
------------------------------